Thursday, September 09, 2010

Soy un perdedor

It's been growing, like another wart on the ugly face of American pop culture, for a few years now.

I'd hear these rumors and rumblings and increasingly regular references on popular fake news television shows. Like jungle drums starting in the distance and getting closer… "beck"…"Beck"…"BECK"… For some reason, everyone seems to be talking about Glenn Beck. Especially the people who hate him the most.

They have virtually canonized him in the social media circle jerks like Twitter, where it's common to see attempts at wise cracks from 140 character pundits such as ... The thing that doesn't make sense to me is why, when so many people dislike him so much, do they devote so much of their cognitive energy him.

I mean, it's one thing to listen, read, talk to people with whom you disagree. This is a sign of healthy intellect. But have to realize where a person stands and that person isn't likely to change their position (especially when their career and their millions of dollars are dependent upon them being in that position).

I mean, if you're a hemp wearing, flag burning, drum circle sitting hippie and you've regularly listened to Rush Limbaugh for the last 20 years -- well, you might want to reconsider the hemp thing.

You know what I'm sayin?

If you're one of those delusional Hope&Change suckers with your head stuck firmly in Nancy Pelosi's assets and your pink blinders filtering out all rational evidence that both so-called political parties have failed The Republic (if you can still call it that) miserably and you still bother to scour YouTube for Glenn Beck's latest screed, then I can only conclude that you're either not-so-bright or you're some kind of rage addict.

Or both.

Look, I like you guys. I really do. That's why it's so awkward to try to explain to you how you're being used. But I'll do it anyway. Because when you care about someone, you keep their best interests in mind even when it's uncomfortable.

You see, son, Glenn Beck doesn't give a flyin' FOX what your opinion is. I suspect that he doesn't even care what his own opinion is. To Beck, it isn't important to have the "right" opinion, or even to have a well considered and rational opinion (obviously). It's only important to have an opinion that a lot of people (not to put too fine a point on it, but YOU) disagree with.

In fact, the more irrational and polarizing his statements, the better. This will get people reacting, talking to their friends, posting on Twitter and Facebook and blogs. That keeps him on the top of the consideration ladder. Keeps his audience numbers high (again, that's you).

And that keeps the advertising dollars rolling in.

It's a pretty old game. Something that Limbaugh and Howard Stern have been doing for years, not to mention a certain dumbass from the west side of Topeka and even local bloggers. People like Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow do it as well, they just don't seem to be as good as Beck at manipulating large numbers of people who both agree and disagree with them.

So to sum it all up: You are being used1.

If you hate Glen Beck so much, you should stop paying attention to him. To be ignored is the biggest injury you can inflict upon his ilk.

1) Yes. I do realize that by posting this on my blog I have been drawn into the whole affair of promoting Beck by criticizing him. And it does make me ill. But it's a sacrifice I'm willing to make to try to get you people to see that you're being manipulated

tagged: , , , , , ,


  1. Exactly the same thing happened with the tea baggers and especially the Koran burning preacher in Florida. Make fun of the lunatics, then move on quit obsessing.

  2. That is exactly the reason I refuse to reference the Topeka bunch in any way. No matter how repugnant, any commenting (positive or negative) gives them power.

  3. I have to admit, though, that I DO love it when Jon Stewart makes fun of Beck. I think he does exactly what The DLC says should happen...make fun of the crazies, and then move on. It works best that way, IMO.

  4. The difference between Beck and the others you mention like Stern and Limbaugh is that Beck actually injected himself into the political process. I don't know if its because he's begun to believe his own hype or if he actually has some type of genuine moral conviction, but by staging that rally at the Lincoln Memorial I'd argue he's jumped the shark.

    Limbaugh and Stern and Warren Beatty--they talked about entering politics, but of course they never did it. They're entertainers. Enter politics and you might actually have to accomplish something. Might have to have something to show for your actions at the end of the day.

    For Limbaugh and Stern, all they have to do is rail, rail, rail and rant rant rant. At the end of the day its just kids stuff. But look at Schwarzanegger (sp?) in California. How much fun is it to be him now?

    Beck's fate is now tied to the Tea Baggers. They may do well in November (or maybe not--October's economic numbers will play a huge role), but time will eventually turn. And then he'll be done. A footnote as they say.

    Conversely Stern and Limbaugh, they can just keep going on and on and on.


Your turn to riff...